Constructivism

 

 

 

The latest catchword in educational circles is “constructivism”. Constructivism is a theory about knowledge and learning; it describes what “knowing” is and how one “comes to know” Piaget’s theory of cognitive development suggests that humans cannot be “given” information, which they automatically understand and use, they must “construct” their own knowledge.  They have to build their knowledge through experience. Experiences allow them to create mental images in their head.  Cognitive prospective theories focus on both what students learn and the process by which they do so (Fosnot, 1996). 

 

It recognizes the construction of new understanding as a combination of prior learning, new information, and readiness to learn.  Individuals make choices about what new ideas to accept and how to fit them into their established views of the world (Brooks & Brooks, 1995). Constructivism has been labeled as the philosophy of learning that proposes learners need to build their own understanding of new ideas.

 

Constructivism continued to grow throughout the second half of the 20th century, and it is now the focus of numerous books and journals.

What, exactly, is constructivism? Five basic themes pervade the diversity of theories expressing constructivism. These themes are:

(1) active agency, (2) order, (3) self, (4) social-symbolic relatedness, and (5) lifespan development.

 

Human experiencing involves continuous active agency. Second comes the contention that much human activity is devoted to ordering processes – the organizational patterning of experience by means of tacit, emotional meaning-making processes. In a third constructivists argue that the organization of personal activity is fundamentally self-referent or recursive. This makes the body a fulcrum of experiencing, and it honors a deep phenomenological sense of selfhood or personal identity. The fourth common theme of constructivism is that individuals cannot be understood apart from their organic embedded ness in social and symbolic systems. Finally, all of this active, meaningful, and socially-embedded self-organization reflects an ongoing developmental flow in which dynamic dialectical tensions are essential. Order and disorder co-exist in lifelong quests for a dynamic balance that is never quite achieved. The existential tone here is unmistakable. Together, then, these five themes convey a constructive view of human experience as one that emphasizes meaningful action by a developing self in complex and unfolding relationships.

 

The basic premise of constructivism is that an individual learner must actively "build" knowledge and skills (e.g., Bruner, 1990) and that information exists within these built constructs rather than in the external environment.

 

There are nine general principles of learning that are derived from constructivism. These nine principles are:

 

1.

Learning is an active process in which the learner uses sensory input and constructs meaning out of it.

2.

People learn to learn as they learn. Learning consists both of constructing meaning and constructing systems of meaning.

3.

Physical actions and hands on experience may be necessary for    learning, especially for children, but is not sufficient; we need to provide activities which engage the mind as well as the hand. Dewey called this reflective activity.

4.

Learning involves language: the language that we use influences our learning. Lev Vygotsky, a psychologist that helped in the theory of constructivism, argued that language and learning are inextricable intertwined.

5.

Learning is social activity: our learning is intimately associated with our connection with other human beings, our teacher, our peers, our family, as well as casual acquaintances. Dewey pointed out that most of traditional learning is directed toward isolating the learner from social interaction, and towards seeing education as a one-on-one relationship between the learner and the objective material being learned.

6.

Learning is a contextual: we learn in relationship to what else we know, what we believe, our prejudices and our fears.

7.

One needs knowledge to learn: it is not possible to absorb new knowledge without having some structure developed from previous knowledge to build on. The more we know, the more we learn.

8.

Learning is not instantaneous: it takes time to learn. For significant learning we need to revisit ideas, ponder them, try them out, play with them, and use them.

9.

The key component to learning motivation. (Constructivist Learning Theory,2002). “Education is about using knowledge, not acquiring it” (Vermette, Foote, Bird, Mesibow, Harris-Ewing, & Battaglia, 2001,p.3). “Constructivism is a psychological theory that construes learning as an interpretive, recursive, building process by active learners interacting with the physical and social world” (fosnot, 1996,p.30).


Becoming a Constructivist Teacher:

 

A constructivist teacher sets up problems and monitors students exploration, guides the direction of student inquiry and promotes new patterns of thinking (Brooks & Brooks, 1995).  It is up to the teacher to facilitate the constructivist learning process.  The structure of the learning environment should promote opportunities and events that encourage and support the process of understanding.

 

The teacher’s response “No”, causes the students to feel foolish.  The teacher needs to encourage the student and support them.  This is the idea of constructivism and what it means to be a constructivist teacher. The purpose of a constructivist teacher is to make the students think for themselves, and not to wait for the teacher to tell them what to think. 

 

In traditional classrooms the teacher seeks the correct answer to validate student learning, whereas in a constructivist classroom the teacher seeks the students point of view (Brooks & Brooks, 1999).  The students will learn to proceed with less focus and direction from the teacher.  With a constructivist teacher the students can express their own ideas clearly in their own words and not have to respond to restricted question.

 

The constructivist teacher has to guide and not tell.  The student has to make their own meanings and decisions.  They are not to be handed to them by the teacher.  To facilitate real learning, teachers need to organize their classroom and their curriculum so that students can collaborate, interact, and raise questions of both classmates and the teacher.

 

Creating a constructivist classroom:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Along with having a constructivist teacher it is also needed to have a constructivist classroom. Creating a constructivist classroom requires that the classroom teacher must be in position to:

 

a)

influence or create motivating conditions for students,

b)

take responsibility for creating problem situations

c)

foster acquisition and retrieval of prior knowledge and

d)

create a social environment that emphasizes the attitude of learning to learn. "The learning process not the product of learning is the primary focus of constructivism…”(Olsen, 1999, p2).  

 


The whole idea of a constructivist classroom is characterized by the mutual respect between the teacher and the students.  In most classrooms the respect is one way.  The students have to respect the teacher.  A constructivist teacher respects the students by allowing the students rights to their feelings, ideas, and opinions.  The teacher refrains from using their power unnecessarily.  A characteristic of constructivist education is that the responsibility for decision making is shared by everyone in the classroom (De Vries & Zan, 1995). 

 

Instructors need to realize that the best way to learn is not from lectures, but by letting the learners construct knowledge for themselves.  People often say that everyone can learn.  Yet the reality is that everyone does learn.  Every person is born with a brain that functions as an immensely powerful processor.  However, traditional schooling inhibits learning by discouraging, ignoring, or punishing the brain’s natural learning processes. In order for learners to be able to actively construct their own knowledge, rather than receive preformed information transmitted by others. Curriculum emphasis, classroom interactions, and classroom dynamics must change in major ways (Green & Gredler, 2002). 

 

Thinking Curriculum:

 

Changing the traditional ways of schooling is not an easy task though.  Just as students do not easily let go of their ideas, neither do school boards, principals, parents, or even teachers. Constructi-vism promotes increased social interaction and discussion in the classroom, both between teachers and students and between students.

 

Advocates of a constructivistic approach suggest that educators first consider the knowledge and experiences students bring with them to the learning task. The school curriculum should then be built so that students can expand and develop this knowledge and experience by connecting them to new learning. Advocates of the behavioral approach, on the other hand, advocate first deciding what knowledge or skills students should acquire and then developing curriculum that will provide for their development.

 

 

If we start with the student's knowledge base before we have established desired end goals, there is a tendency to have the students simply “make progress,” thereby limiting students who are not adequately prepared. These students may develop adequate thinking skills, but can have large gaps in their knowledge and skills. On the other hand, if we focus only on desired end goals, especially knowledge goals, without consideration of the student's acquired knowledge and background, we run the risk of developing knowledge and skills that have no meaning to the learner and are therefore easily forgotten.

 

 

Constructivism represents one of the big ideas in education. Its implications for how teachers teach and learn to teach are enormous. To date, a focus on student-centered learning may well be the most important contribution of constructivism.